(this is still a draft and will probably be rewritten a couple of times...)
'Why is there anything at all then?
Some will probably say that the explanation is found within the faith, the religions etc - others, that the answers (in time) will be explained by science etc.
But...what if ....there is another explanation?
If the 'Existence of Everything' could be made visible/represented by a circle - then nothing could be placed outside this circle...(if so, the circle had to be widened to also include 'whatever-it-was' that lay outside - otherwise we had not included everything EXISTING within the 'Existence of Everything', right?).
Meaning that the 'Existence of Everything' own cause (or presuppositions) - also must lie within the boundaries of this circle (that is kind of hard for us to understand - since we can't really relate anything like that to anything equivalent in our world)
But what about a state that we could call 'The Absolute Nothing'....? The problem with such a state is - that it could not contain it's own cause-to-exist. Because if it did...then 'Absolute Nothing' wouldn't be 'Absolute Nothing' (as it then contains something, namely it own 'cause-to-exist', right?)
It would be something like this:
'The Existing of Everything' = 'The Absolute Nothing' + 'The Absolute Nothings cause to exist' + 'The Existing of Everythings cause to exist'
I know there is a logical flaw there - as, again, our logic (normally) dictates that something can't contain its own reason for existence. But....I'll leave that for now - as I first have to take another 'sidestep'.
***
I said in the beginning that I would use elements from science, religions and so on - and now - I want to challenge physics and mathematics;
If physics and mathematics are basis for the development of our physical world - why shouldn't we assume that physics and mathematics (to a certain extent) also form the basis for a 'semi-physical world' and, that at least mathematics, are valid in a 'non-physical world' ?
It may not be the reason why those universes exist - as I think the entire Framework was made in order to be able to get physical life experience - but there might be some sort of physical/mathematical connection between everything within the Framework.
If EtRu's are the creators of Framework's - then, among other things, mathematics and physics would be knowledge they would have gotten during their time as ItRu's within an earlier framework.
Math is purely 'non-physical' and could have its origin within 'The Existing of Everything' but comes to use in a 'non-physical universe', and physics...well, it starts deep within the 'non-physical universe, but are used in the 'semi-physical univers', while our universe...is based upon both, but it mainly created in order to make movement, action etc.
We know quite a lot about Eisteins theory of relativity, we have begun to scratch the surface of The quantum mechanics. Our 'modern math' is relatively understandable - an exceptin are math that relates to infinities.
What if the structure within the Frameword is built on the following;
Sadly, I doubt I'll ever get mathematicians or physicists to research on something like this...lol
***
Anyway, lets go back to this....
As said, our logic dictates that something can't contain its own reason for existence.
So....well, we might have to remove 'The Existence of Everythings cause to excist' from within The EoE
But....if we remove that 'cause'....where did 'The Existence of Everything' arrive from then?
Strictly speaking, there is only one 'logical' answere to that (no matter how weird it might sound) - the cause lays of course on the 'outside' of The EoE....
Yeah, I know - it sounds crazy, right.....as absolutely nothing can be on the 'outside' of The EoE...or...can it?
Let's look at this term we call 'NOTHING';
Once upon a time only Roman numerals were used in some parts of the world. The problem with Roman numerals was that it had no symbol for zero. It was not until the Decimal system were introduced that a symbol for zero was put into use.
What if our perception regarding 'nothing' is suffering a little bit of the same 'destiny' her? That we mistakenly consider 'nothing' to be....nothing - when in stead, it might be far from that.
Look at it this way. Most of us do have dreams I guess....
And....You, the dreamer, exist - so obviously you belong witin 'The Existence of Everything'.
The dream, then? Well, the dream itself also belong within The 'EoE'...but.... what about the contents of the dream....?
The content of a dream does not necessarily exist. Not quite sure how to explain it, but for instance - you may dream of world peace, and even though both you and the dream exist, the content 'world peace' .... does not exist...
In other words, 'nothing' might not be what we think it is - we might have a whole world of 'something' out there that simply.... does not exist....
....also meaning that 'The Absolute Nothing' (and its cause), can be removed from The EoE, as it is not a question that belongs within the world of 'The EoE' - it's a question that belongs within 'The World of Nothing'.
Furthermore, given that everything may only exist due to a deep desire to acquire physical life experience, we may simply end up with something like the following situation…
But hold on; Where did ItRu and EtRu go?.. you might ask.
Oh, they're still out there. It's just a matter of where on the lines you place them. In any case, they originate from The World of Nothing...
But the biggest consequence of this might be that it's not only The Physical-, The Semi-physical- and The Non-physical dimensions/universe that is part of The Framework, but rather everything within the frames of The Existing of Everything.
Everything made - solely on a desire to test out every possible form of existence
***